news

Elections Today Pandemics And Presidential Elections Penn Today

Published: 2025-04-02 15:05:57 5 min read
Pandemics and presidential elections | Penn Today

The intersection of elections and pandemics has reshaped democratic processes worldwide, exposing vulnerabilities in voter access, misinformation, and institutional trust.

The 2020 U.

S.

presidential election conducted amid the COVID-19 crisis became a case study in how public health emergencies influence electoral integrity, political polarization, and governance.

With the 2024 election approaching, lessons from the pandemic era remain urgent, raising questions about preparedness, disinformation, and the future of democracy.

While the pandemic forced innovations in election administration such as mail-in voting and expanded early voting it also exacerbated existing inequalities, fueled conspiracy theories, and deepened partisan divides, revealing systemic weaknesses in how democracies balance public health with electoral fairness.

# The 2020 election saw unprecedented reliance on mail-in voting, with over 43% of ballots cast by mail a 300% increase from 2016 (Pew Research Center, 2021).

States like Pennsylvania expanded absentee voting, leading to record turnout but also logistical challenges, including delayed results and legal disputes.

-: Increased accessibility for high-risk voters (elderly, immunocompromised).

-: Partisan resistance (e.

g.

, Trump’s unfounded claims of fraud) and uneven implementation (some states rejected ballots over minor errors).

Scholars like Richard Hasen (, 2020) argue that while reforms improved participation, they became politicized, undermining confidence in results.

# The pandemic amplified misinformation, with false claims about stolen elections and illegal ballots spreading rapidly.

A Stanford study (2021) found that election-related lies on social media increased by 85% in 2020, disproportionately targeting mail-in voting.

-: The Big Lie narrative led to restrictive voting laws (e.

g., Georgia’s SB 202), disproportionately affecting minority voters (Brennan Center, 2022).

-: Some conservatives argue that stricter ID laws prevent fraud, though evidence of widespread fraud remains negligible (Heritage Foundation database shows 0.

00006% fraud rate).

# 3.

Public Health vs.

Politics, pandemics, and protests | Penn Today

Democratic ParticipationExpert ViewCritical PerspectivesProgressivesConservativesElection ScholarsConclusion The pandemic exposed both resilience and fragility in U.

S.

elections.

While reforms like mail-in voting expanded participation, they also became weapons in a partisan war over legitimacy.

The broader implications are clear: without bipartisan commitment to evidence-based policies and combating disinformation, future crises whether pandemics or cyberattacks could further destabilize democracy.

As Penn Today’s 2023 report warns, The next election crisis is not a matter of, but.

- Pew Research Center (2021).

- Hasen, R.

(2020).

Yale Press.

- Brennan Center (2022).

- CDC (2020)